Voice Remote Control--- You censored my words
I was using my cox remote control voice feature. I spoke the title of a documentary I wanted to see, on YouTube, into the remote. The title is "Animals, ** & Dialogue: Breakfast with Hunter Vol. 2". Then on my TV it said (in print) "I cannot handle commands with that type of language.". I checked my parental controls and made sure they were all 'off'. And they were off. I assume cox has an issue with the word "**"..?.. WHO ARE YOU, cox, to tell me that I can't speak the word "**" into my remote control when my PARENTAL CONTROLS ARE TURNED OFF.!!???!! In this case, WHY EVEN HAVE PATRENTAL CONTROLS when YOU CENSOR my words anyway???!!?? There has not even been a child in my house since I've had cox, and that's been 21 YEARS!!!! I'm 82 years old and typing in that title the hard way, is very hard for me to do......686Views0likes4CommentsCox email censorship?
I've been trying to send an email from my Cox account to another Cox account and when I do, I get: An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded: <xxxxxxxxx@cox.net> message rejected. Refer to Error Codes section at www.cox.com/.../email-error-codes.html for more information. AUP#CXSNDR. Please check the message and try again. The email is long and has the following link in it to a government website: https://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/33/01804.htm&Title=33&DocType=ARS When I remove the link, the email goes through just fine. If I send a short sentence with this link, it goes through just fine. But long text with this email and I get the error. When I call support, they tell me that I need to spend $10/ month on a support plan and they will help "fix" my Thunderbird email client. Rep says that if the problem ends up being on Cox's end that they will not give me a refund. Is this a ploy to make more money from us? I am baffled why this would be a problem on my end. Also today I tried to respond to a perfectly valid commercial email message today and same error message. I have not played around with removing content, but this is unacceptable.2.5KViews0likes2CommentsRejected messages
It appears the new spam filtering service Cox is using (cloudfilter.net) is blocking a lot of valid mail. I would like to know where our individual portals and addressbooks are that we can configure our own whitelists and to be able to see what messages are being rejected. It is one thing to be identify a message as spam, and another thing entirely to reject them without notification. I have mail senders from a good number of places and since my mail volume has dropped by over 75%, it is quite safe to assume the spam aggressiveness thresholds are set quite high as well as are the bulk sender identifiers and anti-spoofing features. While you claim to not whitelist senders, you do need to provide your users the ability to do so. No doing so means you are censoring email Also, it is poor form to put a like to review changes and then have it error out. http://postmaster.cox.net/confluence/display/postmaster/Error+Codes If you are going to implement such a service you should become a lot more responsive with corrective actions. I am now on my second day waiting for an answer on my ticket with Tier 2, and third day with the actual issue at large.5.8KViews0likes7CommentsRe: Our Apologies
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 07:04:49PM -0500, Cox Communications wrote: > We owe you an apology for your recent experience with our residential > email service. We pride ourselves on delivering your most important > connections, and candidly, we recognize that did not happen. We are > focused on how we can improve your trust in our service and with our > company. Our hope is that we have begun to do that with this apology > and explanation. Hello, I'm not too put out about your email issue, but I am incredibly concerned about some interesting behavior I saw from your HTTP connection handlers during the outage. I witnessed pages being modified in transit to inject pop-up windows, and the realization that your network contains the equipment required to do this is alarming to me. I understand your wish to inform customers of the outage, but as a common carrier, violating the integrity of data in transit is unacceptable. I know that this same equipment could be used invisibly to do search-and-replace operations on arbitrary pages for censorship or any other purpose, or visibly to inject ads or other unwanted media. Additionally, according to my understanding of copyright law, it is illegal to create derivative works of web pages unless the license allows it. If this is the case, you have violated the law by modifying pages which pass through your network. On behaf of your customers and internet engineers as a whole, I'd like to request that you remove this capability from your network immediately. Thank you. - -- Marcus Wanner -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQ0uYVAAoJEHkZLCwtmxuJOr0QAOGcPZ2PrUYBbABDdRfIr4Io tnoSAXkvXrtNgqNNWWHEf/ZpzHKrsw7CsYntzBdtCRC1CCSgmQnWnXrXsApeCFMG 1VsG9h6+Qm9SfGE55/bmWIebqtuJEo+DlKO/dHM9TQRYv5Y+Nk5r/IxyJz6rZ+Ml jyuQ3E8BuFW5Udxr1ANY8C3z4JBvjNrAblDQwSUEQA1xycNcMmVGHDBzn8cx7Lkh wKe+zzx20qJod/erP5MXOabB18Io70i2dGo0bb4VKxk2mQvTqdsPtxLf7STIX4QK Lb+a0NYDd8KssvwJOFtd9xqvNGbPZ65muaooyocwgrub4MKLpVURZWwZl4B3ZKCr V4F+XCeIBPCGrj4Zc9Q9LArRxlA+TZd4jaAs3uMftEu2phjLXLuz7MHvqWIDFt8G Kprq9hwDAI8dnxUV/hMI5GQyqUuji/nDFr3wJ//coh4YRX4FmCrdDxhmXt+k4jyP FhwBKZmgPHjHI2/kgmJj2IGXfzN4lsq7aMGXyJPrKk61LvEEwm3VPJABm2NB0/BG Xu7Cxeca+ZU+nEHz2ShBK4u0hTfAYlqVq/yl+dLVr/Lcmub06gRN1ZQGdc5hyuBq gzDmKnOZghBn90u9goJWTLa2cB2YuKf17PpL2PzHLUBSG/1uo7/uVpiGy7MeHs+F y0TbAoNoYycJh5uxwgdJ =8g/F -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----7.1KViews0likes4Comments