SportsCar said:
Microsoft Security Essentials is not compatible with Windows 8.1 (which I have now) or 10 (which I am upgrading to)
My mistake. I have used it on XP and Windows 7, and I thought they would have continued to support for later OS. Maybe now they are pushing Defender? I find Defender to be too intrusive for my taste, but then again I haven't used it since the early versions.
SportsCar said:
Memory footprint is not an issue for me, plenty of power.
If you have "power" then you know you can never have too much "power". As you can see in this diagram, Mcafee is the most bloated, and that is excluding memory release issues. Why waste memory running that shiney UI in the background when most hardly use it? To each their own though. Also, here is another good article on the shortcomings of Mcafee, but there are plenty more out there. I was not meaning to insult something you enjoy, but just wanted to make sure you were informed of other options. Alot of people just use the AV that comes on their PC, and don't know there are other options.
SportsCar said:
McAfee is universally held as an excellent product.
I disagree with this statement. Can you quote some sources? It is a "popular" product because it pays PC manufacturers to include its product in OEM, along with other bloatware. And yes, for some people it works, and some people may use it for years without problems, but that doesn't mean a different solution might not have also been worry free at better performance levels and free.