Caller-ID For All, To Dissuade Telemarketers
Just my opinion. If COX was serious about reducing Telemarketers, then even your Essential phone service would include 'Caller-ID'. Even as nearly useless as Caller-ID has become, this small allowanc...
Forum Discussion
It's disturbing Cox actually goes through a process to remove the Caller ID.
Mouth is right about Caller ID not being truthful...or at least even accurate...but it would provide the initial stink test.
What is EXTREMELY disturbing lately is the number of calls lately with “Anonymous” in the Name line that Nomorobo has not been blocking. It was working well for a while, but now it is NOT blocking numbers that have already been blocked and reported to Nomorobo for which there is a recording. For example, there is a recording of 205-272-6009 on Nomorobo’s list, but TWICE I received calls that were NOT blocked because of the “Anonymous” in the name line. I even got one AFTER I reported it to them. Cox really needs to work to block those type of calls, because Nomorobo is becoming as much of a flop as Cox’s email filters (if I get ONE MORE Wild Alaskan email that is not blocked I may have to file suit). AND JUST AS I TYPE THIS, GUESS WHO CALLED FOR THE THIRD TIME?!!
- @JP Sports, for additional support regarding our nomorobo service, please don't hesitate to send us an email at cox.help@cox.com. We are here to help resolve any issues you're having in any way we can. -Kevin
