Forum Discussion
- mkautzm6 years agoNew Contributor II
This is after power cycling hardware, although it doesn't really matter because the problem is outside my house (I assume 10.75.135.1 is the CMTS). Everything is wired, but it wouldn't matter because the problem is at the CMTS - you can even verify this by looking at the hop to my router, which is reliably sub 1ms. Same thing with damaged connections - the response time to my router is sub 1ms.
The problems I experience are self-evident. If the the response time to the CMTS has +/- 300ms, it means response times to every service is +/- 300ms.
Evidence suggests strongly that the area is oversold and the CMTS is overloaded during peak hours.
- KevinM26 years agoFormer ModeratorHello, the second hop (10.75.135.1) is more than likely your modem, as it is a private IP Address. Additionally, the first hop appears to be a wireless router because the numbers begin with 192. Your modem shows it's been online for 67 days. When power-cycling the equipment, I recommend unplugging the modem itself for at least 60 seconds. Can you please perform another traceroute on a hard-wired connection?
Also, issues are you experiencing with our internet service specifically? -Kevin M. Cox Support Forum Moderator- mkautzm6 years agoNew Contributor II
It is not uncommon for a CMTS to show up as a local address. If you'd like another view of this, these results are FROM a service provider, TO my house:
02/12/2019 04:13:22 UTC
--------------------MTR:
Start: Mon Dec 2 04:13:26 2019 Blizzard 1.|-- Blizzard 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.0
2.|-- 24.105.18.3 0.0% 10 0.7 5.4 0.5 47.9 14.9
3.|-- 137.221.105.16 0.0% 10 0.7 1.0 0.6 1.2 0.0
4.|-- 137.221.66.18 0.0% 10 1.3 9.0 1.0 60.6 18.8
5.|-- 137.221.83.66 0.0% 10 5.7 5.9 5.7 6.2 0.0
6.|-- 137.221.65.68 0.0% 10 5.8 14.2 5.7 53.1 17.7
7.|-- 137.221.68.32 0.0% 10 5.8 9.5 5.8 35.3 9.1
8.|-- langbbrj02-ae1.301.r2.la.cox.net 0.0% 10 5.4 7.9 5.4 29.7 7.6
9.|-- 68.1.1.170 0.0% 10 7.5 10.1 7.5 31.1 7.3
10.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11.|-- ip70-181-109-239.oc.oc.cox.net 0.0% 10 122.2 78.3 16.7 297.4 85.6
Looking at the last result, you can clearly see there is a great deal of variance, indicating an overloaded (or misconfigured) node in the route. I had a post with a lot of other examples showing similar results.
Related Content
- 6 months ago
- 6 years ago
- 11 years ago