Welcome to the Cox Community
Our community is a collaborative place to learn about Cox products and services. Jump into the conversation today!
Messages
Selected Messages
Our community is a collaborative place to learn about Cox products and services. Jump into the conversation today!
New Contributor
•
25 Messages
Closed
Do I need anything other than a Docsis 3.0 modem that will handle 300Mbps? I have a Motorola 6180 and I ask support about it and some say all I need is a 3.0 and other say that I need a 16 channel modem.
So I go to the local shop and they don't even know what I'm talking about. I'm lost at this point. My modem OEM specs are upto 300Mbps I should see at least some improvement I would think
Discussions
•
Updated
11.7K
12
0
0
Internet outage 24 hrs
Discussions
4
0
Disabling CoxWifi
Discussions
3
Why is HBO Max subscription renewal necessary?
Discussions
1
0
Connectivity issues for years
Discussions
1
0
Pro Connect Charges
Discussions
0
0
Billing cycle
Discussions
1
0
Package site
Discussions
0
0
Bills
Discussions
1
0
Internet outage 24 hrs
Discussions
4
0
ChrisL
Former Moderator
•
Because the modem has a maximum speed of about 300Mbps or so that means it won't be suitable for sustaining speeds above 150Mbps while somebody else is on the Internet. For this reason customers that don't have 16x channel modems won't be getting the Ultimate speed increases. Visit http://www.cox.com/residential/support/internet/article.cox?articleId=b2ec95d0-7ef9-11df-5590-000000000000 for more information on modems approved for use on our network.
0
0
Sl4ck3r
New Contributor
•
well that's a bogus reasoning and completely ridiculous. And I'm well aware of the approved modem list. I was sent to the cox store to get an "approved" 16 channel modem and they don't know what I"m talking about. How do you upgrade speeds and don't have the equipment available to support it?
0
0
ChrisL
Former Moderator
•
Don't forget that the modem's max rates speed isn't actually based on the modem but rather the node which is shared. In short, a modem capable of 300Mbps cannot achieve 300Mbps. As for finding approved equipment most retailers of electronics will have equipment that will meet the performance requirements.
0
0
Sl4ck3r
New Contributor
•
Well the lack of knowledge about the new upgrade requirements just caused me to waste half a day over nothing. I got techs telling me all I need is a 3.0 modem, I got others telling me to go rent one it's definitely available at my local store, and others that say "your market doesn't have the 300Mbps" so which is it? What speed do I have in zip code 67211 for Ultimate
0
0
ChrisL
Former Moderator
•
I believe the changes have just started in your market which may explain some of the confusion. The new speed profiles have launched however there does seem to be some last minute delays getting the new channel bonding configurations launched. In your particular area however the speed increase will only be to 200Mbps.
0
0
AllenP
+4 more
Valued Contributor
•
ChrisL, can you please explain these two statements:
"Because the modem has a maximum speed of about 300Mbps or so that means it won't be suitable for sustaining speeds above 150Mbps while somebody else is on the Internet."
and
"Don't forget that the modem's max rates speed isn't actually based on the modem but rather the node which is shared."
The modem doesn't know how many devices are on the network. Granted you have a 300Mbps pipe shared with all devices on the network but why would overall bandwidth slow down if "somebody else in on"??
If you are saying the theoretical speed is not attainable, like with WiFi, that's one thing. But I don't understand what you are saying about shared nodes. Are you saying because of node sharing you get significantly less then the spec of 42.88 Mbps per channel? Thanks.
0
0
ChrisL
Former Moderator
•
That is correct, the modem doesn't know how many devices are on the node and it doesn't need to. The modem's rated maximum speed is simply the measure of the fastest pipe it is capable of connecting to and that pipe is shared. For example, a theoretical 300Mbps pipe can provide 150Mbps to 2 customers simultaneously or 75Mbps to 4 customers, etc.
0
0
AllenP
+4 more
Valued Contributor
•
I'm confused. Are you saying if my 2 neighbors and I each subscribe to 300Mbps Ultimate, we share a 300Mbps pipe and each get 100Mbps???? I thought we each had a 300Mbps pipe at least to the local node. This doesn't make sense since each node typically serves 500+ customers. If all 500 were sharing one 300Mbps pipe, nobody would get any speed.
0
0
Sl4ck3r
New Contributor
•
@allenP I'm just as confused as anyone right now.... after figuring out my Ultimate speeds apparently doubled with NO notification I inquired about it and talked to a total of 13 people of which I got a different answer of some sort. I got everything from "it's not totally available now" to "all you need is a 3.0 modem" to "based on your address 300Mbps is definitely available!" to "you need a 16 channel 3.0 modem" to a tech support chat agent attempting to send a tech. Now I'm just saying this overall and not going to nor do I need to call anyone out as this is the "normal practice" of Cox.... but every tech support agent is undertrained or misinformed whatever you want to call it. of ALL the internet tiers... Ultimate customers are going to be the MOST LIKELY to inquire about the upgrade that they hear about.... therefore a simple memo to all Cox reps would be useful or a employee reference whatever may be the case to refer to for the CORRECT answer. Today I wasted half the day because I was told that 300Mbps is available and I need a 16 channel modem and it is definitely available at my local store. I go there and they have no clue what I'm even talking about. I swap my owned gateway out for the one I picked up that "is compatible" and get home and it doesn't make one bit of a difference for a charge of $9.99/month. I take it back and reactivate my gateway I own after being told that I can't get the upgraded speeds on my SB6180 and what do you know.... 250Mbps but on this very thread I'm told that my modem can only handle the pipe blah blah blah... some useless lingo.... I'm getting the upgraded speeds on my current modem as my area is only 200Mbps as of now but yet I'm told by countless reps I have to upgrade to either a rental or buy a modem that I don't even need to pay the $9.99 a month OR the $99.99 to buy a modem. I'm just really disgusted with the level of support I get as an Ultimate customer it's unsatisfactory.
0
0
Tecknowhelp
Valued Contributor II
•
I think Chris is trying to simplify the answer but at the cost of accuracy. Think of it like traffic on a highway. There is the physical limit of how many cars can fit on the road, which depend on the number of lanes, but once you start getting even close to that number, traffic becomes more of a issue. Because of this, Cox tries to work in a buffer between what speeds your technically able to get and the speeds your modem is configured for. That's why a DOCSIS 2.0 modem usally can't get above 32Mbps even though it could technically get up to 38Mbps according to the specs.
As for what modem you need, it would either be the Arris SB6183, SB6190 or the Netgear CM500. There are other options if your open to gateways, but I wouldn't suggest them.
0
0
AllenP
+4 more
Valued Contributor
•
I understand running at 100% of capacity and with speedboost you will go over the 300Mbps max on an 8 channel modem. But ... Chris said Sl4ck3r's area is only increasing to 200Mbps, well below the 300Mbps max. Even with speedboost, you will only go up to about 250Mbps and, as Sl4ck3r posted, is doable with an 8 channel modem. So, I agree, if you are getting 300 or above, a 16 channel modem is required but you can get by with 8 channels at 200 or below. DOCSIS 3.1 is just around the corner, why update now if you don't have to? Finally, where I'm confused is all Chris' talk about shared pipes. Not sure his point there.
0
0
ChrisL
Former Moderator
•
The node is the shared pipe. For this reason we consider modems provisioned at more than 50% of their theoretical capacity to be insufficient for said tier of service.
0
0