Perky's profile

New Contributor

 • 

2 Messages

Closed

T3 and T4 time out issues

My service seems to be working fine, however the modem itself is providing several indications that things are not fully functional. Can someone tell me what is likely occurring here?

Here are modem details:

Model Name: SB6121
Vendor Name: Motorola
Firmware Name: SB_KOMODO-1.0.6.14-SCM01-NOSH
Boot Version: PSPU-Boot(25CLK) 1.0.12.18m3
Hardware Version: 5.0
Firmware Build Time: Mar 6 2014 15:23:55

I see the following entries in the modem logs:

TimePriorityCodeMessage
Jan 10 2015 22:06:46 3-Critical R05.0 Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - T3 time-out;
Jan 10 2015 22:06:16 3-Critical R04.0 Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;

The status page also suggests that the modem is offline:

TaskStatus
DOCSIS Downstream Channel Acquisition Not started
DOCSIS Ranging Not started
Establish IP Connectivity using DHCP Not started
Establish Time Of Day Not started
Transfer Operational Parameters through TFTP Not started
Register Connection Not started
Cable Modem Status Offline
Initialize Baseline Privacy Done


The "signal" page suggests that I'm having some kind of issue with upstream on channel 2 (see the upstream ranging status row):

DownstreamBonding Channel Value
Channel ID 97  98  99  100 
Frequency 795000000 Hz  801000000 Hz  807000000 Hz  813000000 Hz 
Signal to Noise Ratio 38 dB  37 dB  37 dB  37 dB 
Downstream Modulation QAM256  QAM256  QAM256  QAM256 
Power Level
The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading
10 dBmV   9 dBmV   9 dBmV   8 dBmV  

UpstreamBonding Channel Value
Channel ID
Frequency 21600000 Hz  26500000 Hz  33000000 Hz  37900000 Hz 
Ranging Service ID 171  171  171  171 
Symbol Rate 2.560 Msym/sec  5.120 Msym/sec  5.120 Msym/sec  2.560 Msym/sec 
Power Level 41 dBmV  41 dBmV  41 dBmV  41 dBmV 
Upstream Modulation [3] 16QAM
[3] 64QAM
 
16QAM
 
[3] 16QAM
[3] 64QAM
 
[3] 16QAM
[3] 64QAM
 
Ranging Status Success  Retries Exceed  Success 

Success 

New Contributor

 • 

11 Messages

Your frequency on the channel ID's is extremely high, but they will most likely tell you your equipment is faulty and "everything is good on our end". Con you into a new gateway rental and swap your box out once a month when your box decides to stop working when in reality you have a line issue. Good luck, I'm on month 7 with no resolution and a new gateway I purchased. Gooo COX for the upsell!

Moderator

 • 

2.3K Messages

Hello Perky,

The signal levels that your modem is reporting is very poor. Are you currently using a splitter on the cable line going to that modem? Also, do you have any amplifiers running to this cable line? 

Allan - Cox Support Forums Moderator

New Contributor

 • 

2 Messages

There is a splitter where the coax comes into the house and there is a splitter behind the entertainment center. Both are splitters that were provided by cox support staff during an onsite visit. I say that because they explained that many of the splitters provided by popular retailers are of lesser quality than those used by Cox support staff. I just double checked the splitter behind the entertainment center to make sure all of the connections are tight. I imagine that everyone will start to ask me to bypass the splitter(s) and see if things are better. Since I currently have connectivity and decent bandwidth, I don't plan to tackle such a bypass because my entertainment center has to be emptied and moved in order to do so. When you say "signal levels that your modem is reporting is very poor", can you please explain which fields you're talking about and what the acceptable/expected range of values would be? I do not have any amplifiers.

Former Moderator

 • 

7.1K Messages

@Perky

-10 to +10 is considered acceptable for the receive levels although the closer to 0  you can get the better.  35 to 50 would be considered normal for the upstream signals.  

Related Content

  • Closed

    12

    0

  • Closed

    5

    0

  • Closed

    1

    0

  • Closed

    1

    0

  • Accepted Solution

    Closed

    2

    0

Recent Discussions

View More

Loading...