Read the forum guidelines
I've been dealing with a spotty connection for the past few weeks, well, few months really, but the past few weeks have been exceptionally bad.
I've noticed that during the periods of Cox network failures my data "usage", as shown on their website, is significantly higher than normal. During these periods it also deviates significantly from the throughput logged by my gateway, which is both fairly consistent day-to-day and more representative of the expected network load.
My assumption is that this is due to retries initiated by the modem. There have been a huge number of un-correctable errors logged by the modem across a number of channels during these periods, so that seems to support my theory.
Does anyone have any insight into this?
I feel your on point, but you will never get Cox to admit it, even if they were aware. The only way to really push back is to have a alternate way to measure your data usage. Do you use your own router or rent one from Cox?
I do have that ability, and the fact that the numbers (mine vs Cox) don't match is what got me thinking about this.
First, oops. So used to Cox customer's using the Panoramic junk. What model is your router or how are you measuring data?
Second, I think the usage time line differs then most others and that could play a role in differences. Also, your data wouldn't include overhead. The question I have is uncorrectables considered overhead. Good luck on your query.
Re-transmissions are considered overhead as well as the Traffic Management messages of the protocols. TCP would obviously have more overhead than UDP. I would go as far as including noise as overhead.
I don't think a router could measure the overhead between the modem and remote server(s). A router could only measure what it receives from the modem as well as its own local TCP messages and, perhaps, any noise on your personal network.
I suppose you could only checksum your data totals is to have a personal passive measurement device connected in front of your modem.
What's that number as your Forum name...is that something sensitive?