Forum Discussion
4 Replies
- TecknowhelpValued Contributor II
I see Cox did delete the post. Could a moderator respond to why? Cox is being VERY shady about this whole thing. If this one gets deleted I will keep creating duplicates threads until answered. Not wise to mess with bored nerds.
- ChrisLFormer Moderator@Tecknowhelp
Other than the original post not being technical in nature I don't see anything that would have violated the rules of this forum. Whatever may have happened I was not involved in that process.
- TecknowhelpValued Contributor II
IMO the amount of bandwidth available to a tier is just as important as the speed. If Cox decreased the speed of the Ultimate tier without any notice before OR after, wouldn't that warrant a post asking why? And then when someone posts a question, a Cox employee deletes the post (even though you said they shouldn't have) and there is no notice of who did?
I would like to suggest this forum get some 3rd party moderators. This and other mistakes show Cox moderators to be company bias.
- chris_c21Contributor III
Yes it was indeed changed without notice, Victor. See this other thread:
http://forums.cox.com/forum_home/internet_forum/f/5/t/14239.aspx
Also:
https://www.dslreports.com/forum/r30804367-ALL-Ultimate-Tier-data-cap-dropped-from-2-TB-to-1-TB
Related Content
- 10 years agoCReiches
- 2 months agoRazorbackGeek
- 4 months agoWiderMouthOpen
- 10 years agoat120
Recent Discussions
- 20 days agoChrisB
- 6 years agoBeeping_Noise
- 6 years agoCarnival
- 6 years agoAmo